HIGH SALIENCE / RESEARCH / VIDEO CONFERENCING TEARDOWN
TEARDOWN 17 · PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 26, 2026 · DATASET INCLUDED
100 Questions, Seventeenth Category: Video Conferencing and Webinar Software, Where Zoom Is the Default and Teams and Meet Are Picked for Their Suites
Seventeenth category, same method: 100 video conferencing and webinar software queries, ChatGPT with web search on, every answer coded by two independent AI readers, Google's top ten as a control. Zoom is the default: named in 76 answers, recommended in 73, and picked as the answer's own choice in 63, including 18 of the 20 direct advice questions. Microsoft Teams and Google Meet come next, picked in 41 and 35 answers, and the model usually ties them to a condition: that the buyer already pays for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. Webinar questions keep Zoom and add a specialist, most often Demio or Livestorm.
01Method
Same query structure, same coding, one new category.
Queries: 100 video conferencing and webinar software queries built from the same templates as the earlier teardowns: 30 category, 30 comparison, 20 alternative and 20 recommendation. The full list is in the dataset.
Surface: ChatGPT with web search forced on, logged out, United States, English, via the DataForSEO scraper, one run per query, collected September 26, 2026.
Control: Google's top ten organic results for the same queries in the same window, via the DataForSEO SERP API at depth 20 and truncated to the first ten organic results.
Coding: every answer was coded by two independent AI readers (Claude agents working blind from a written protocol), with a third settling disagreements. They were not people. Each brand named was coded picked (the answer's own verdict: "my pick", "choose X if", a shortlist it tells you to act on, the #1 of its ranking), recommended (assigned to a stated case or fit, such as "best for small teams", without being the answer's verdict), listed (named as an option, no fit given), passing (named but not offered as an option) or anchor (the brand being replaced in an "alternatives" query), against a 45-brand dictionary fixed after collection, before the final coding run (every change is listed in DICTIONARY_CHANGES.md), under codebook v2.0. "Recommended" in the tables includes picked brands. The two readers agreed on 99.3% of brand codes in this teardown (100.0% at the recommended level). Cited URLs were deduplicated to their domain and classed as first-party or third-party. The third reader decided 3 of the 404 brand codes in this teardown. A rules-based first pass (the codebook v1.6 rules) agreed with the final codes on 93.3 percent at the recommended level; only the reader codes are published. The readers also coded six brand mentions that no dictionary alias matched (named by meaning or only by a web address); those rows are in the dataset.
Collection note: the ChatGPT answers and the Google controls were collected on September 26, 2026 through the DataForSEO standard queue, with raw responses saved exactly as returned; the raw files carry UTC timestamps, early September 27. No task failed and none was re-run. One dictionary change was made after collection, before coding: Microsoft Teams also matches the short name "Teams", capitalized only, because the answers name Teams in full once and then make the pick with the short name ("Already using Microsoft 365 → Teams"). Where "Teams" is the ordinary word at the start of a table cell (five answers), the readers coded it as not a mention. Four aliases that are also ordinary words (Whereby, Slack, Discord, Teams) match only when capitalized. google.com and microsoft.com count as Google Meet's and Microsoft Teams' own sites, so their help and documentation pages are first-party citations. Both dictionaries and the list of changes ship with the dataset.
One run per query, so this is a teardown, not the benchmark. Frequencies describe this window only. Absence means not observed in this sample, never zero visibility.
02Findings
One default, two suite picks, and a specialist for webinars.
| Brand | Appears in | Recommended in | Picked in | Picked share of appearances |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom | 76 | 73 | 63 | 83% |
| Microsoft Teams | 55 | 53 | 41 | 75% |
| Google Meet | 49 | 48 | 35 | 71% |
| Webex | 33 | 30 | 21 | 64% |
| Jitsi | 20 | 20 | 13 | 65% |
| Whereby | 14 | 14 | 9 | 64% |
| Demio | 14 | 14 | 14 | 100% |
| Livestorm | 12 | 12 | 12 | 100% |
Each linked brand has its own page: how ChatGPT recommends every brand in this dataset, with positioning labels, head-to-head results and sources.
Out of 100 answers, codebook v2.0. "Picked" means the answer itself chose the brand as its verdict, overall or for a case. "Recommended" means the answer assigned the brand to a stated case or fit, and includes picked brands. "Appears" adds brands named as an option with no fit. The brand being replaced in an "alternatives" query is excluded from all columns.
Zoom is the default
Zoom is named in 76 of 100 answers, recommended in 73 and picked as the answer's own choice in 63. It is picked in 18 of the 20 direct advice questions, and it is the only pick for online teaching, a law firm and a church. It is also picked in 48 of the 75 answers to questions that do not mention Zoom. Only 3 of the 63 lines that pick Zoom mention Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. Webex is fourth: named in 33 answers, recommended in 30, picked in 21, and 16 of the 21 picking lines name Cisco, security, compliance, regulation, government, enterprise needs or encryption.
Teams and Meet are picked for their suites
Microsoft Teams is named in 55 answers, recommended in 53 and picked in 41; Google Meet is named in 49, recommended in 48 and picked in 35. The picks come with a condition. On 31 of the 41 lines that pick Teams, the answer names Microsoft 365, Office or Outlook: "Already standardized on Microsoft 365 → Teams". On 24 of the 35 lines that pick Meet, it names Google Workspace, Gmail, Google Calendar or Classroom. The same condition shows up where the model describes them without choosing them. Meet and Teams have the largest gaps between recommended and picked of any brand named 15 or more times, 13 and 12 answers. In all 12 of those Teams answers it is described as the fit for Microsoft 365 users, and in 11 of the 13 Meet answers as the fit for Google Workspace, Gmail or Classroom users. Counting both, the suite condition is attached to Teams in 43 of the 53 answers that recommend it and to Meet in 35 of 48.
Webinars and verticals get a specialist
Twenty of the questions are about webinars. Zoom is picked in 16 of them, and a webinar specialist is picked in 15. The model rarely swaps Zoom out; it adds a tool built for the job: Demio is picked in 11 of the 20, Livestorm in 9, ON24 and WebinarJam in 5 each. Across all 100 answers, the specialists are picked every time they are named: Demio 14 of 14, Livestorm 12 of 12, ON24 6 of 6, BigMarker 6 of 6. The six telehealth and therapist questions follow the same pattern: Doxy.me is picked in all six, SimplePractice in five, and all six answers mention Zoom's healthcare offering. Open source and self-hosted questions go to Jitsi, BigBlueButton and Nextcloud Talk. Retired products stay retired: Skype appears only as the subject of the Skype alternatives question, whose answer notes it was retired in May 2025, and BlueJeans, Hopin and Amazon Chime are never named.
Decisive, and far from Google
Ninety-two of the 100 answers pick at least one brand. Seven of the eight that do not still assign brands to stated cases; the eighth, for an enterprise with 5,000 employees, is one sentence naming three contenders. Twenty-six of 30 head-to-heads pick every brand named. Two pick one side: Zoom vs Webex picks Webex for Cisco-heavy enterprises, and Google Meet vs Jitsi picks Jitsi for open source. Of the 271 picks, 227 went to brands whose own website did not rank in Google's top ten for the question, 84 percent. Google's top ten is 87 percent third-party pages.
Vendor pages, and list sites that do not rank
Across 100 answers there were 280 citation events to 92 domains. Vendors' own sites took 170 of them, 61 percent, and 52 answers cited nothing but vendor pages. Zoom's domains are cited in 49 answers, 32 of them to questions that do not mention Zoom, and Zoom's help center alone in 25. microsoft.com is cited in 35 answers and google.com in 20, including their support and documentation pages. The most-cited independent sites are list and comparison pages: dupple.com in 8 answers, stackfyi.com in 6, toolradar.com in 5. None of the three was in Google's top ten for any question that cited it. Reddit and Wikipedia have zero citations.
Forty-three of the 280 citation events involved a domain that also sat in Google's top ten for that query, 15 percent, level with website builders for the lowest overlap in the series so far. For third-party sites alone it was 6 of 110.
0317 categories, side by side
Same rulebook, every category so far.
| Measure (codebook v2.0) | Project management, Sept 8 | CRM, Sept 17 | Email marketing, Sept 17 | Help desk, Sept 17 | Accounting, Sept 17 | Payment processing, Sept 17 | Payroll, Sept 21 | HR software, Sept 26 | Applicant tracking, Sept 26 | Password managers, Sept 26 | Endpoint security, Sept 26 | Business intelligence, Sept 26 | Data warehouse and ETL, Sept 26 | Ecommerce platforms, Sept 26 | Website builders, Sept 26 | Scheduling, Sept 26 | Video conferencing, Sept 26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendations per category answer (average) | 5.9 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
| Answers with no recommended dictionary brand | 1 of 100 | 5 of 100 | 1 of 100 | 1 of 100 | 0 of 100 | 5 of 100 | 1 of 100 | 6 of 100 | 5 of 100 | 3 of 100 | 3 of 100 | 3 of 100 | 2 of 100 | 3 of 100 | 0 of 100 | 5 of 100 | 1 of 100 |
| Answers with no pick (the answer's own verdict) | 2 of 100 | 11 of 100 | 2 of 100 | 4 of 100 | 9 of 100 | 22 of 100 | 19 of 100 | 17 of 100 | 12 of 100 | 7 of 100 | 7 of 100 | 5 of 100 | 3 of 100 | 7 of 100 | 2 of 100 | 8 of 100 | 8 of 100 |
| Most-recommended brand: appears / recommended | Asana 73 / 73 | HubSpot 75 / 74 | Mailchimp 58 / 56 | Zendesk 70 / 69 | QuickBooks 75 / 73 | Stripe 70 / 68 | Gusto 73 / 73 | Rippling 58 / 57 | Workable 53 / 52 | Bitwarden 84 / 82 | Microsoft Defender 68 / 67 | Power BI 75 / 73 | Snowflake 50 / 50 | Shopify 75 / 75 | Wix 70 / 70 | Calendly 57 / 56 | Zoom 76 / 73 |
| Most-picked brand: appears / picked | Asana 73 / 70 | HubSpot 75 / 69 | Mailchimp 58 / 44 | Zendesk 70 / 61 | QuickBooks 75 / 65 | Stripe 70 / 54 | Gusto 73 / 61 | Rippling 58 / 50 | Workable 53 / 47 | Bitwarden 84 / 78 | Microsoft Defender 68 / 62 | Power BI 75 / 69 | Snowflake 50 / 46 | Shopify 75 / 69 | Wix 70 / 62 | Calendly 57 / 51 | Zoom 76 / 63 |
| Head-to-head queries recommending every named brand | 30 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 30 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 26 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 30 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 30 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 30 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 30 of 30 |
| Head-to-head queries picking every named brand | 30 of 30 | 23 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 25 of 30 | 19 of 30 | 21 of 30 | 21 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 27 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 28 of 30 | 27 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 29 of 30 | 26 of 30 |
| Recommendation-intent queries with a dictionary recommendation | 19 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 19 of 20 |
| Recommendation-intent queries with a pick | 19 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 19 of 20 |
| Recommended mentions where the brand does not rank in Google's top 10 | 398 of 468 (85%) | 269 of 387 (70%) | 313 of 419 (75%) | 350 of 445 (79%) | 206 of 368 (56%) | 294 of 360 (82%) | 202 of 383 (53%) | 310 of 405 (77%) | 333 of 388 (86%) | 218 of 304 (72%) | 273 of 369 (74%) | 355 of 401 (89%) | 360 of 426 (85%) | 313 of 376 (83%) | 324 of 376 (86%) | 241 of 325 (74%) | 298 of 349 (85%) |
| Picked mentions where the brand does not rank in Google's top 10 | 349 of 416 (84%) | 226 of 330 (68%) | 270 of 370 (73%) | 291 of 380 (77%) | 141 of 279 (51%) | 170 of 222 (77%) | 113 of 246 (46%) | 232 of 311 (75%) | 261 of 311 (84%) | 163 of 241 (68%) | 231 of 319 (72%) | 292 of 336 (87%) | 303 of 365 (83%) | 227 of 285 (80%) | 262 of 309 (85%) | 200 of 276 (72%) | 227 of 271 (84%) |
| Google top 10 that is third-party pages | 746 of 1,000 (75%) | 710 of 1,000 (71%) | 720 of 1,000 (72%) | 714 of 1,000 (71%) | 743 of 1,000 (74%) | 787 of 1,000 (79%) | 653 of 1,000 (65%) | 820 of 1,000 (82%) | 871 of 1,000 (87%) | 866 of 1,000 (87%) | 778 of 1,000 (78%) | 823 of 999 (82%) | 777 of 1,000 (78%) | 868 of 1,000 (87%) | 906 of 1,000 (91%) | 780 of 999 (78%) | 873 of 1,000 (87%) |
| Citation events to vendors' own sites | 216 of 362 (60%) | 136 of 320 (42%) | 193 of 367 (53%) | 152 of 345 (44%) | 125 of 302 (41%) | 161 of 301 (53%) | 192 of 314 (61%) | 167 of 325 (51%) | 139 of 311 (45%) | 201 of 292 (69%) | 149 of 266 (56%) | 190 of 274 (69%) | 197 of 267 (74%) | 194 of 277 (70%) | 189 of 331 (57%) | 137 of 296 (46%) | 170 of 280 (61%) |
| Answers citing only vendor pages | 50 of 100 | 40 of 100 | 37 of 100 | 27 of 100 | 34 of 100 | 47 of 100 | 49 of 100 | 34 of 100 | 30 of 100 | 65 of 100 | 44 of 100 | 60 of 100 | 60 of 100 | 55 of 100 | 41 of 100 | 42 of 100 | 52 of 100 |
| Share of citations in the 10 most-cited domains | 54% | 40% | 42% | 45% | 55% | 58% | 55% | 46% | 44% | 72% | 58% | 62% | 60% | 61% | 54% | 35% | 54% |
| Citation events whose domain is in Google's top 10 | 83 of 362 (23%) | 83 of 320 (26%) | 97 of 367 (26%) | 80 of 345 (23%) | 99 of 302 (33%) | 98 of 301 (33%) | 134 of 314 (43%) | 85 of 325 (26%) | 59 of 311 (19%) | 78 of 292 (27%) | 72 of 266 (27%) | 44 of 274 (16%) | 54 of 267 (20%) | 56 of 277 (20%) | 51 of 331 (15%) | 63 of 296 (21%) | 43 of 280 (15%) |
| Reddit and Wikipedia citations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All columns are coded under codebook v2.0 by two independent AI readers per answer; the project management column is the September 8 dataset recoded under it. Each teardown is one run per query in its own window, so differences between columns mix category with collection date.
04What this changes
Four things, in order.
Say which buyer you beat the bundle for. The model's first move for Teams and Meet is to ask what the buyer already pays for. A standalone vendor needs a plain, citable statement of the case where it wins anyway: external clients, large webinars, compliance, no downloads.
Be the specialist the model adds. On webinar questions the model kept Zoom and picked a specialist in 15 of 20 answers. Demio was picked in all 14 answers that named it. Name your use case (lead generation, course sales, virtual events) the way a buyer would ask for it.
Your help center is part of your marketing. Zoom's support site was cited in 25 answers, and Microsoft's and Google's documentation pages show up throughout. Pricing, participant limits and feature pages are what the model quotes; keep them current and specific.
List sites that do not rank still get read. Three comparison and list sites were cited in 18 answers between them without ranking in Google's top ten for any of those questions. If a page like that covers your category, it is part of your AI search footprint.
05Limitations
What this teardown cannot tell you.
One run per query means answer variance is unmeasured; Benchmark 01 runs each query three times across three surfaces. The teardowns are collected on different days, so differences between categories mix the category with the date. The brand dictionary covers the general video conferencing and webinar software market and deliberately excludes vertical tools, so their appearances are described in prose and not counted. The readers are AI models, not people: they follow a written protocol and agree with each other closely, but a shared blind spot would not show up as disagreement. The line between picked and recommended is a judgment, documented in the protocol with examples. Sentiment is not coded. No vendor-tool cross-check was read for this category. Google's control counts a brand as ranking only when its own domain is in the top ten; a listicle that features the brand does not count. One run per question, one day, United States, English, logged out. Answers vary between runs, so these are frequencies for this sample. The readers are AI models, not people, and the line between picked and recommended is a judgment; the three codes the readers disagreed on were all of that kind. The suite counts check the answer line the readers cite for each pick, so a condition stated only in a neighboring sentence is not counted. google.com and microsoft.com are counted as the vendors' own sites, so their share of first-party citations includes documentation pages that serve many products.
06Dataset
Check it, don't believe it.
Every number above can be recomputed from these files. CC BY 4.0: use them, cite the page.
- queries.csv: the 100 queries with intent labels.
- brands.csv: the 45-brand dictionary with aliases and canonical domains.
- mentions.csv: 399 coded brand mentions with position, type, a 0/1 picked column and whether the brand's domain was in Google's top ten.
- citations.csv: 280 citation events with domain class and Google overlap.
- observations.csv: one row per query with brand, recommendation, citation and control counts.
- dictionary-changes.md: the one dictionary change made after collection (the short name Teams)
- brands-original.csv: the dictionary as first drafted, before that change
- coder-notes.md: coding method, reader agreement, the judgment calls that matter in this category, and dictionary notes
- codebook.md: the rulebook, with dated amendments through v2.0.
- reader-protocol.md: the written protocol both readers coded against (codebook v2.0).
- picked_stats.json: the picked-level figures.
The earlier teardowns: Teardown 01, project management, Teardown 02, crm, Teardown 03, email marketing, Teardown 04, help desk, Teardown 05, accounting, Teardown 06, payment processing, Teardown 07, payroll, Teardown 08, hr software, Teardown 09, applicant tracking, Teardown 10, password managers, Teardown 11, endpoint security, Teardown 12, business intelligence, Teardown 13, data warehouse and etl, Teardown 14, ecommerce platforms, Teardown 15, website builders, Teardown 16, scheduling.
Seventeen categories, and the answer depends on what you already pay for.
In video conferencing the model's picks follow the software suite a buyer already uses, and its reading list is vendor help pages plus list sites that do not rank. Finding out what the model is reading for your category is the first thing a Category Salience Brief does, with a query set you approve first.